Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

I should say, using my terms, that the question Aristotle addresses in his metaphysics is, \Nhat What is the concrete as concrete? Or what is meant, properly, by the abstraction "concreteness"?

Of course, this is to use "concrete" (as wel1 well as "concreteness") as I use it, and this means, as Aristotle himself uses oV(Hnovoua-namely, to refer to tla "a complete fact," to what, as he says, requires nothing but itself in order to exist, and what everything else requires in order to exist.

Aristotle's answer to his question is, The concrete in the sense of "a complete fact" is a substance, or, as I would translate, "an individua1individual." My answer, on the contrary, is, The concrete in the sense of "a complete fact" is not a substance, or an individual, but an event.

...