Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Alexandra Sam

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Jennifer Heise

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

It is false to say, as Hartshorne does, that "only persons --– or, at least, sentient individuals -– have intrinsic value" ("The Formal Validity and Real Significance of the Ontological Argument": 235 f.).

Not only persons or sentient individuals, but.alsq anything else that is comparably concrete has intrinsic (as well as :~t;;fi!:l4t constitutive) value. Why?
" co~,,· +,.~
Becaus~ th~ Because the line between intrinsic (as well as l:ASfrUmCfttaJ..;constitutive) and (merely) i~U"m~J:iKfvalue constitutive value lies between all concretes, ~the on the one side, and all
A
abstracts, on the other.

12 October 1996