Page History

...

But, then, why hold out for psychicalism's being a properly metaphysical, or ontological, position – -- as distinct from really being a counterpart to Post's attempt to develop a metaphysics within the limits of physics alone, i.e., an attempt to develop a metaphysics within the limits of psychics alone? As true as it may be (indeed, must be!) that Hartshorne's position, no less than Post's, necessarily presupposes and implies a properly transcendental metaphysics, it itself is really something very different, although, ironically, Hartshorne doesn't appear to be very clear about this.

...