Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Thus in Jesus' message gospel takes the place of law; and it is in this context that Mk 1:15 is to be exegeted. The faith in the gospel for which Jesus calls is opening oneself to the rule of God now breaking in, risking the offered communion with God. But wherever such opening of oneself and risking occurs, the consequence can only be immediate repentance. The order here, however, is decisive. Repentance is not a precondition for the coming of God's rule, but rather its result. In one's repentance, the inbreaking rule of God attains its goal (5JSJ: 21 f.).

 I I have two comments on Marxsen's interpretation.

The first is that Sanders's interpretation of Jesus -- especially his argument that Jesus, unlike John the Baptist, is not a preacher of repentance (230-237) -- fully converges with Marxsen's. In fact, Sanders explicitly speaks of Jesus' message as "good news about God," in contrast with "a standard exhortation to give up wickedness and turn over a new leaf," thereby implying that, in his view also, the distinctive thing about Jesus' message is that gospel takes the place of law (234)..

 My second comment is that Marxsen's notion that the gift is never to be had except in one's own doing (SJ: 23) and that, therefore, the inbreaking rule of God attains its goal only in one's repentance, converges very closely indeed with Wesley's insistence that God (gives and) demands nothing other or less than outward as well as inward holiness. Indeed, Marxsen is at least as emphatic as Wesley that the Christian life happens in the body and that what is (ever again) given (and demanded) by God is nothing other or less than "entire sanctification/, which is to say, the perfection of God's own perfect love (cf., e.g., C-p: 78,57,104 f.).

11 May 1996