Page History

According to Hartshorne, lithe"the principle of process" is that "the togetherness of what-does-not-become-and-what-becomes itself becomes ... with the consequence that reality in its inclusive sense coincides with process (as something _indicated,_ _not merely named; process-now, not just process taken generically) and the further consequence that God, or reality itself, is Process-itseltitself, our God now, more inclusively than \[God\] is immutable or eternal Being-itself" ("Tillich's Doctrine of God": 194)._

But why should this principle of process be affirmed? Aside from the dialectical argument that the alternative principle---that fixed being is inclusive---has the consequence of denying the reality of process altogether (169), there is the appeal to our direct experience: H"\[O\]ur experience, itself a process, discloses only processes and what can be abstracted therefrom\[.\] A 'being' which is neither any process nor any datal constituent of process, but something _simpliciter_ _more inclusive than all process---this_ _cannot_,_ _it seems, have literal meaning, for nothing of the sort appears in experiencing\!" (195)._