Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

l-Iaving so long thought of Whitehead's thinking of the good, or the beautiful, as the mean of harmony between the extremes of intolerable conflict, on the one hand, and intolerable monotony, on the other, I was struck by his saying, "Evil is the haHhalf-way house between perfection and triviality. It is the violence of strength against strength." This he says in a context in which he explains: The good of the soul, to which the indwelling Eros urges it, "resides in the realization of a strength of many fee1ings feelings fortifying each other as they meet in the novel unity. Its evil lies in the dash of vivid feelings, denying to each other their proper expansion. Its triviahty triviality lies in the aniEsthesia anæsthesia by which evil is avoided. In this way through sheer omission, fewer, fainter feeli feel ngs constitute the final Appearance" (AI: 355).

Whether, or how, what is said here can be reconciled with how I'm accustomed to interpreting Whitehead's view remains to be thought about. I incline to think that what he actually says about the good of the soul, its evil, and its triviality can be fairly interpreted as respectively the mean between the two extremes, notwithstanding his use of "evil" to refer solely to clashing, or conflict, of strength against strength, and not also to triviality. There seems little reason to suppose, however, that he ever uses "aniEsthesiaanæsthesia" to indicate anything positive (dcf., e.g., 'The Peace that is here meant is not the negative conception of aniEsthesiaanæsthesia. It is a positive feeling which crowns the 'life and motion' of the soul" 13671|367|).

11 May 2009