Page History

SCANNED PDF

Houston Smith's criticisIll of "Process Theology" (in his Why Rcligioll 
Matters: 74 f.) is pathetic. It not only relies naively on a crude distinction between 
"naturalistic theism" and a "mystic worldview," but also sins gravely against the 
ninth comlnandment-most certainly in the case of Hartshorne, if not also in that 
of VVhitehead, between both of whonl and "VVienlan's naturalism" there is a great 
gulf fixed. 
Houston Smith's criticism of "Process Theology" (in his Why Religion Matters: 74 f.) is pathetic. It not only relies naively on a crude distinction between "naturalistic theism" and a "mystic worldview," but also sins gravely against the ninth commandment-most certainly in the case of Hartshorne, if not also in that of Whitehead, between both of whom and "Wieman's naturalism" there is a great gulf fixed. 

...