Page History

...

second, to allow that, just as there cannot be an adequate distinction between God's creative activity and God's emancipative (providential) activity, so there cannot be an adequate distinction between God's consummative activity and God's redemptive activity -- There cannot be an adequate distinction in either case for the same reason: neither creation nor consummation is a single unique event on a time line, running from the first at the beginning of the line to the second at its end. Although everything other than God has its primal source and final end in God, that there is something other than God has neither beginning nor end. "Evermore from his store, new-born worlds rise and adore!"; and

Wiki Markupthird, to maintain, nevertheless, that one can and should distinguish, even if only inadequately, both between God's creative activity and God's emancipative (providential) activity and between God's consummative activity and God's redemptive activity \ -\- These distinctions can be made inadequately insofar as everything other than God exists, if it exists at all, contingently, not necessarily. Considered, then, with respect to anything's existence as such in some state or other, one can speak of God's creative activity as the sole primal source of its existence, while speaking of God's emancipative \ [providential\] activity as the sole primal source of its existing in just this, that, or the other particular state. _Mutatis mutandis_, one can speak of God's consummative activity as the sole final end of anything considered with respect to its existence as such in some state or other, while speaking of God's redemptive activity as the sole final end of its existing in just this, that, or the other particular state.

October 1989; rev. 9 September 2003