By Schubert Ogden
...
It appeared to me for a time that there can be a third sense in which a given person or witness may be said to be "implicitly Christian." The other two senses in which this may be said are clarified in Notebooks, 9 November 1997 and, especially, 13 December 2002. What seemed to be a possible third sense is well expressed in the following passage from Notebooks, "On 'the Christian Witness of the Bible,'" 29 March 1995:
Panel | |
---|---|
|
Having reflected further, however, I'm now convinced that the sense of "implicitly Christian" clarified in this passage is not really a third sense after all. On the contrary, if a witness can be said to be implicitly Christian if, and only if, it is a way of acting that "follows from, and in this sense is implied by, one's self-understanding as a Christian" -- and this is the condition explicitly stipulated in the passage -- then it necessarily presupposes the Christian proprium and can only be a Christian witness in the first of the two senses clarified, especially, in the second full paragraph of Notebooks, 13 December 2004. In this sense, I may be said to be implicitly a Christian because "I am so related to Jesus, mediately if not immediately, that he is of decisive significance for my life and for all human life, although I do not (yet) explicitly confess him to be so."
...