Page History

SCANNED PDF

Ontological Argument 

Wiki Markup+Major Premise+: Whatever is coherently conceivable is +either+ actual unactualized \ [but real, more than merely "logical"\] potency.

Minor Premise: God, or Perfect Being, is coherently conceivable.

Conclusion: God is either actual or an unactualized potency.unmigrated-wiki-markup

+Third Premise+: God is not an unactualized potency \ ["potency of perfection" being meaningless or self-contradictory\].

Conclusion: God is actual.

...

Addendum on Ontological Argument--in Relation to Burne's Forkunmigrated-wiki-markup

The validity of the ontological argument turns on the validity or invalidity of a law, admitting of no exceptions, that the relation between essence and existence is always contingent. This can be derived, if at all, only from an understanding of the meanings of "essence" and "existence" as such. Thus if we do not know the validity or invalidity of the law we do not know altogether what we mean by these fundamental conceptions. On the other hand, the ontological argument derives God's exceptional relation to existence from an analysis of his essence, i.e., perfection. If the meanings of the concepts that define perfection ("greater" \ [=better than\], "none," "possible") imply existence, then the above law is shown not to be universally valid. Since necessity of existence is essential to God or any serious religious conception of his nature, one or the other of two things must be true: the conception of God (universal as it is) is sheer nonsense, contradicting the general law connecting properties and individuals---essence and existence---; or this law is not without an exception because of the metaphysical uniqueness of the supreme being.