Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

This is true, at any rate, if what constitutes practical theology as such is the question of critical validation addressed to the fittingness of witness to this, that, or the other particular situation, past, present, or future. On this understanding, by contrast with the one expressed above, practical theology is distinct from historical theology in being constituted by (one particular form of) the question of critical validation, as distinct from the question of critical interpretation, while it is distinct from systematic theology (which asks the other particular form of the question of critical validation) in addressing its question to the fittingness of witness to the particular situation in and for

2

which witness is borne, as distinct from addressing its question to the adequacy of witness to its content, and thus to its appropriateness to Jesus Christ and its credibility to human existence, in any historical situation whatever.

...