Page History

SCANNED PDF

Christensen makes a very strong case that Maurice's christology is consistently representativist and anti-constitutivist. He also holds, to be sure, that the christology of the New Testament is essentially constitutivist and that therefore, judged by the Bible and the doctrinal standards of the Church of England, Maurice's teaching was rightly found to be "deficient and unsound" by his contemporaries. But whether Christensen is right in this further contention, it is hard to quarrel with his judgment that Maurice was, in fact, what he intended to be – a be—a consistent representativist.

...