By Schubert Ogden
The usual way of employing the scheme of question and answer that I also employ is to conceive the question as other than a self-answering question and as therefore admitting of a plurality of equally meaningful, even if not equally true, answers, all logically more specific than the question itself. But granted that there can indeed be a plurality of equally meaningful answers to the religious question, is this because, like any other non-self-answering question, it is logically more general than any answer to it?
...