Page History

SCANNED PDF

Wiki MarkupI noted earlier that, for all his talk of "the Name" of God as though it were itself the object as well as the ground ofChristian of Christian faith, Maurice can distinguish clearly and sharply between lithe "the Name" itself, i.e., Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and the reality it names or expresses-namelyexpresses—namely, "the Infinite Charity, the perfect Love" _(Notebooks: 24_ _September 2007; 14 October 2007)._ _(Sermons on the Sabbath-Day:_ _93 f. \[quoted by Vidler: 188\]). The distinction here between "the name of God," or "invoking the name of God,_{_}II_ _and "\[God's\]_ _presence"_ _evidently functions in much the same way as the distinction elsewhere between God's name and the_ _reality_ _it_ _names or expresses._

But I have also been happy to note another distinction he makes to much the same effect. Speaking of different ways ofdestroying of destroying national characteristics by reducing its members merely into one great society, he says, "the result is the same. A living God is not feared or believed in; He is not the centre ofthat of that combination; His name or the name ofa of a number ofGods of Gods may be invoked in it, but His presence is not that which holds its different elements together" (Sermons on the Sabbath-Day: 93 f. [quoted by Vidler: 188]). The distinction here between "the name of God," or "invoking the name of God," and "[God's] presence" evidently functions in much the same way as the distinction elsewhere between God's name and the reality it names or expresses.

31 October 2007