Page History

SCANNED PDF 

Wiki MarkupAccording to Danto, "Words like 'true' and 'real' . . . describe nothing in the world. Nor do they describe features of sentences. They pertain wholly to the space which opens up between the world and language." Thus "\[a\] sentence is true when it corresponds with the world, as something is real when it corresponds with a \ [true?\] sentence."

Question: If this may be said of at least two of the so-called convertible transcendentals (i.e., verum and ens,) , may it not also be said, mutatis mutandis, of all the others, and so of convertible transcendentals as such?

Whatever the answer, I have long recognized that convertible transcendentals are, in their way, interest-relative. Assuming, then, an "objectively relativistic" account of such interests, one might well conclude that something like Danto's judgment about any of the terms expressive of these interests must be correct.

...