Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Matthew Carroll

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Andrew Scrimgeour

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

SCANNED PDF

I wonder whether "categorial" may not be used in two senses.

In a strict (or proper) sense, it may be used simply as the adjectival cognate of "category," W1.derstood understood as distinct not only from "transcendental," on the one side, but also from "genus," "species," and "individuality (or individual essence)," on the other.

But in a broad sense, may it not be used to include all concepts and terms less abstract than transcendentals (and, in their way, existentials), i.e., genera, species, and individualities as well as categories proper?

If it 19 February 2006maymay, "categorial" designates all determinables or properties less abstract than "transcendentals," whether "genera," "species," "individualities," or "categories" proper.

In a strict (or proper) sense,

But in a broad sense, may19 February 2006