Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

SCANNED PDF

Wiki Markup_More on "the Common Sense of the Subject"_ _

Because all men are created equal, no man is by nature the ruler of another-as another—as any man can be said to be by nature the ruler of any dog-so that legitimate political authority can be said to be grounded in consent. What this means is made more explicit in the Massachusetts Bill of Rights:_{_}

The

...

body

...

politic

...

is

...

formed

...

by

...

a

...

voluntary

...

association

...

of

...

individuals;

...

it

...

is

...

a

...

social

...

compact

...

by

...

which

...

the

...

whole

...

people

...

covenants

...

with

...

each

...

citizen

...

and

...

each

...

citizen

...

with

...

the

...

whole

...

people

...

that

...

all

...

shall

...

be

...

governed

...

by

...

certain

...

laws

...

for

...

the

...

common

...

good.

_{_}The people thus "covenant" with each other to form a people before they have the authority either to establish, to dissolve, or to reestablish political authority. The source of the authority of the people, taken as a whole, lies in the rights with which each individual has been "endowed by \ [her or his\] Creator," which rights can be better secured by governments than they could ever be by individuals acting alone. "The people" consists of human individuals who have covenanted together to be a people in order to have the protection that government can provide. From the people, then, are derived "the just powers" of government. Not _ Wiki Markup_Governments-which is to say, legitimate governments, not governments based upon force or fraud-are instituted "to secure these rights." Whenever any form of government "becomes destructive of{_}{_}any_ _ powers, only _ _just_ _powers. The government cannot derive from the people powers that individuals did not consent should be exercised on their behalf. Limited government in general, and the freedoms of the First Amendment-but Amendment—but not only the First Amendment-in particular are grounded in and derived from the natural rights of individuals._ _these ends,_ _it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it." But their right to alter or abolish governments is not unqualified-not a right_ _ad libitum_ _to be exerci:;;ed for any purpose whatever. The people have a right to overthrow only governments destructive of certain ends, and to institute new governments only as they are conducive to the same ends--ends fixed by the nature of man. The people are at full liberty to deliberate as to what means conduce to these ends, but they do not deliberate as to the ends_ _2{_}{_}themselves. The people are subject to the moral law. They are not a gang of robbers. Because-but only because-they are a "good people"individuals.

Governments—which is to say, legitimate governments, not governments based upon force or fraudare instituted "to secure these rights." Whenever any form of government "becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it." But their right to alter or abolish governments is not unqualifiednot a right ad libitum to be exercised for any purpose whatever. The people have a right to overthrow only governments destructive of certain ends, and to institute new governments only as they are conducive to the same endsends fixed by the nature of man. The people are at full liberty to deliberate as to what means conduce to these ends, but they do not deliberate as to the ends themselves—The people are subject to the moral law. They are not a gang of robbers. Because—but only becausethey are a "good people" they may confidently appeal "to the Supreme Judge of the world, for the rectitude of [their] intentions." they may confidently appeal "to the Supreme Judge of the world, for the rectitude of \[their\] intentions."_

28 July 2004