Page History

Scanned PDF Version of this Document

1. The question of the Christian canon, in the sense of the primary norm for judging the appropriateness of Christian witness, is really the question of the irreplaceable Christian witness – -- the Christian witness that can never be replaced, however much it can and must be interpreted and even reformulated.

...

4. Since the question of whether there can be a Christian theology at all is the question of whether there is a Christian canon, and hence an irreplaceable Christian witness, there is a limit on any theology – -- even a revisionary theology – -- that would be a Christian theology in more than name only. Modern atheisms of either evolutionary or revolutionary type may indeed be revisions of traditional Christian witness and theology. Yet they are not revisionary Christian theologies properly so-called because they acknowledge no Christian witness to be irreplaceable. For this reason, they are properly thought and spoken of as "secularizations" of Christian witness and theology.

5. But, then, the same would be true even of a modern theism – -- even, indeed, of a modern theism whose understanding of God, self, and the world could not be substantially distinguished from that of Christian theology – -- unless it acknowledged some Christian witness to be irreplaceable for determining its understanding. Unless it thus acknowledged some Christian witness as canon, it could not be a Christian theology but only a secularization thereof.

...