Page History

...

But this means that "theory" and "praxis" can both be understood in different senses and are therefore alike "systematically ambiguous." In fact, "theory" has at least three senses that can be clarified by making use of the concept/term "belief," understood as anything held to be true by one who lives understandingly and therefore leads her or his own life. So "theory" can be understood:

(1) in the proper sense as comprising all beliefs formed on only one of the two levels of living understandingly, i.e., the secondary level of critical reflection and (yes!) proper theory;

(2) in the broad sense as comprising all beliefs formed on both levels of living understandingly, i.e., the primary level of self-understanding and life-praxis as well as the secondary level of critical reflection and proper theory; and

(3) in the narrow sense as comprising only some beliefs formed on the secondary level of critical reflection and proper theory, i.e., those expressed by saying "so-and-so is the case," as distinct from "so-and-so should be the case."

So, too, "praxis" has at least three senses that can be clarified by making use of the concept/term "action," understood as anything purposively done by one who lives understandingly and therefore leads her or his own life. Thus "praxis" can be understood:

(1) in the proper sense as comprising all actions performed on only one of the two levels of living understandingly, i.e., the primary level of selfunderstanding self-understanding and life-praxis;

(2) in the broad sense as comprising all actions performed on both levels of living understandingly, i.e., the secondary level of critical reflection and proper theory as well as the primary level of self-understanding and life-praxis; and

(3) in the narrow sense as comprising only some actions performed on the primary level of self-understanding and life-praxis, i.e., those that are institutionally unbound, as distinct from institutionally bound.

...