Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Scanned PDF Version of this Document

I take what orthodoxy analyzes as "the essential or substantial foundation of faith" to be the twofold reality of God and Jesus: God being the transcendental, strictly ultimate reality whose meaning for us is decisively represented through Jesus; and Jesus being the genuinely historical reality that decisively re-presents this meaning (cf. Notebooks, December 1992; rev. 26 November 1993; 15 June 2002).

What formally normative Christian witness has to assert about this twofold reality, however, rests upon two presupposititions presuppositions that it must therefore also somehow affirm.

...

In an analogous way, what Christian witness has to assert about Jesus rests upon the presupposition of genuine historicity, by which I mean the presupposition that the explicit, primal, ontic source of all Christian faith and witness is the fully real historical person designated "Jesus" (a.k.a. "Jesus bar Joseph" or "Jesus of Nazareth"). But here again, what is presupposed is not simply the experienced historical reality of this person, although precisely that is what might be called, in scholastic terms, the "material object" of the presupposition, analogously to the way in which the "material object" of radical montheism monotheism is the all-encompassing whole that we all experience in experiencing ourselves and others. Rather, what is presupposed is the historical reality of this person as also conceived in a certain way, so that its "formal object" is the historical person Jesus in his meaning for us, again, analogously to the way in which radical monotheism's "formal object" is the all-encompassing whole conceived as the one universal individual in its meaning for us. Thus what Christian witness somehow has to assert about Jesus is by way of answering the question as to his identity as a historical person, not, indeed, in his being in himself, then and there in the past, but in his meaning for us, here and now in the present, i.e., as decisively authorizing the understanding of ourselves that is authentic and the understanding of existence in general that is true.

...