Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

SCANNED PDF

As for the objection that I so understand philosophy that it interferes with the proper business of the different areas of life and the different forms of critical reflection corresponding thereto, there are two thoughts that I take to be relevant to meeting it.

...

Could it be that the most serious objection to the kind of philosophical theology that I am prepared to defend is that it, in effect, meddles in the proper business of the particular area of life and of the particular form of critical reflection (or "special science") that has to do with this area---which area—which is to say, religion and theology?

...

To be wise in the sense of the wisdom of which philosophy is the love, or for which it is the search, is twofold.It is not only to know the truth about human existence as such--what such—what it means to exist, and how one ought to do so-but so—but also to know the truth about all of "the directed activities of mankind" (Whitehead), i.e., the various forms of life-praxis and culture--what culture—what it means to engage in them, and how one ought to do so.

It also belongs to wisdom in this sense, however, to know that the truth that it knows about these various activities is distinct from the truth, or, more generally, the validity, that they, and only they, not philosophy, are in a position to know. Thus, for example, to know what it means to do science, and how it ought to be done is not to kn.ow knoow what can be known only by actually doing science, and doing it in this way.

...