Page History

...

The purpose of framing and ratifying a constitution as such is not to set forth the fundamental principles, formal and material, on which the constitution is based. Rather, the purpose of this process is to implement these fundamental principles, or to put them into effect, by means of positive law---—at the level, namely, of constituent or constitutional law, as distinct from governmental or statutory, law.

...

Applied to the specific case of the Constitution of the United States, this means that the laws it comprises can be correctly understood and rightly interpreted in their "original intent" only in the context of the fundamental principles, formal and material, set forth–not forth—not only but preeminently–in preeminently—in the Declaration of Independence. Why does it mean this? Because these are the fundamental principles on which the whole process of framing and ratifying the Constitution as well as its product of constituent laws is in fact based.

By "the fundamental principles, formal and material" here, I mean what I have called elsewhere "a theory of the moral authority of law" in general, or of "the whole process of framing and ratifying constituent law" in particular. Such a theory, I have argued, has two parts, formal and material. The first, formal, or, if you will, "in principle" part consists in a theory as to the logical status of the moral ideas bu by which the lawmaker must, in the nature of the case, be guided. The second, material, or "in fact" part consists in a theory as to just what these moral ideas should be.

...