Page History

SCANNED PDF

In correcting some of my formulations concerning the unique authoritativeness  concerning the  unique 
authoritativeness of human reason over  all supposed  authorities"  (29  March 
1999), I speak of human reason as  "more exactly, the noetic,  as  distinct from 
the  ontic,  implicit  authorizing source." 
In correcting some of my formulations concerning the unique authoritativeness of human reason over all supposed authorities" (29 March 1999 March 1999), I speak of human reason as  "more exactly, the noetic, as distinct from the from the ontic, implicit authorizing source." "human  

While this is correct enough as far as it goes, the qualification "human reason"  is reason" is important. Why? Because, while human reason is certainly not the onticthe ontic, but only the noetic, implicit authorizing source, the tradition in which the which the meaning of "reason" has been discussed rightly allows that  that "reason" (logos, ratio, die Vernunft) has an ontic as well as a noetic reference, and even that even that it is possible and necessary to distinguish an eminent or divine reason reason (Logos, Ratio Ratio). Therefore, while human reason is uniquely authoritative only as only as the noetic implicit source of authority, eminent or, symbolically speaking, divine  divine Reason is uniquely authoritative precisely as the antic implicit source.

I should say that the ontic source of authority that, symbolically speaking, I may call "Reason" is to be spoken of literally, not simply as as "reality," but as the "structure of reality," ontological as well as ontic, allowing  allowing that "reality" has and must have structure in itself as well as contentas content, quality, or value in itself, in order also to have meaning for us us. Thus its Thus its meaning for us is the meaning of its content in itself and its structure in itself in itself for beings who live understandingly, or-to say the same thing in different in different words-who are endowed with human reason, or at any rate with reason with reason in some form appropriate  appropriate to a noneminent or nondivine being.

While this is correct enough as far as it goes, the qualification

I should say that the ontic source of authority that, symbolically speaking, I may call 

On some other occasion, I need  need to work out more fully the connections mentioned connections mentioned or suggested here among my several distinctions between between "structure and  and content,"  "structure and  and meaning,"  "reason and experience and  experience," "intelligibility and mystery,"  "abstract and concrete," and  and so on. 

20 August 1999

20 August 1999