By Schubert Ogden
What Gamwell does, in effect, is to show that there is a metaphysics of of Wiki Markup
distinctively human existence and an ethics corresponding thereto. This he does does
by transcendental arguments from any claim to moral validity to its meta-ethical ethical
implications or presuppositions, which cannot be denied consistently with with
making or implying any such claim. He then shows how these meta-ethical ethical
implications or presuppositions in turn imply a minimal ethics, i.e., the universal universal
formative principle of communicative respect, which is articulated in certain
universal human liberties/rights/duties, public as well as private, as well as a
democratic form of government.
What Gamwell does, in effect, is to show that there is a metaphysics of distinctively human existence and an ethics corresponding thereto. This he does by transcendental arguments from any claim to moral validity to its meta-ethical implications or presuppositions, which cannot be denied consistently with making or implying any such claim. He then shows how these meta-ethical implications or presuppositions in turn imply a minimal ethics, i.e., the universal formative principle of communicative respect, which is articulated in certain universal human liberties/rights/duties, public as well as private, as well as a democratic form of government.
Wiki Markup |
---|
But, surely, the same conclusion could-and, arguably, should-be reached by arguing, not from moral validity claims in particular, but from any validity claims whatever-as Apel appears to confirm when he says, "All beings who are capable of linguistic communication must be recognized as persons since in all their certain universal human liberties/rights/duties, public as well as private, as well as a democratic form of government. _in all t\!zeir actions and utterances_ _they are potential participants in a discussion" (quoted in "The Purpose of Human Rights,"_ _Process Studies_ _29, 2 \[Fall-Winter 2000\]: 332; italics added)._ |
But, surely, the same conclusion could-and, arguably, should-be reached by arguing, not from moral validity claims in particular, but from any validity claims whatever-as Apel appears to confirm when he says, "All beings who are capable of linguistic communication must be recognized as persons since
|
26 December 2002 26 December 2002