Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Wiki Markup
'That to all people, and especially to idolaters, clear knowledge of God was available,' as he says here, so that they are without excuse and it can be proved that they had known the invisible things of God, His divinity, likevvise His eternal being and power, becomes apparent from the following: All those who set up idols and worship them and call them 'gods,' or even 'God,' believing that God is immortal, that is, eternal, powerful, and able to render help, clearly indicate that they have a knowledge of divinity in their hearts. For with what reason could they call an image or any other created thing God, or how could they believe that it resembled Him if they did not know at all what God is and what pertains to Him? How could they attribute such qualities to a rock, or to Him whom they thought to be like a rock, if they did not believe that these qualities were really suitable for Him? When they now hold that divinity is invisible (a quality to be sure, which they have assigned to many gods) and that he who possesses it is invisible, immortal, powerful, wise, just, and gracious to those who call upon him, when they hold fast to this idea so that they confess it also by works, by calling upon him, worshiping and adoring him of whom they think that divinity resides in him, then it follows most surely that they had a knowledge or notion of divinity which undoubtedly came to them from God, as our text tells us. This was their error, that they did not worship this divinity untouched but changed and adjusted it to their desires and needs. Everyone wanted to see the divinity in the one who appealed to him, and so they changed the truth of God into a lie. Thus they knew that the nature of divinity, or of God, is that He is powerful, invisible, just, immortal, and good.They knew the invisible things of God, His eternal power and divinity. This major premise of the 'practical syllogism' \[Footnote 41: In the 'practical' syllogism of the scholastics (in distinction to the 'speculative' one), the major premise was called _synteresis_. It was variously defined as 'a natural inclination,' 'an inextinguishable spark of reason,' 'an inborn habit,' 'a power tending naturally to the good.'\], this theological 'insight of the conscience,' is in all men and cannot be obscured. But in the minor premise they erred when they said and claimed: 'Now, this one,' that is, Jupiter or any other who is like this image, 'is of this type, etc.' This is where the error began and produced idolatry, for everyone wanted to subsume according to his own interests. If they had stayed with this feeling and had said: 'Look, we know this: Whoever this God, or this Divinity, may be whose nature is to be immortal and powerful and able to hear those who call upon Him, let us worship and adore Him, let us not call HiInHim Jupiter and say that He is like this or that image, but let us simply worship Him, no matter who He is (for He must have being),' then without a doubt they would have been saved, even though they had not recognized Him as the Creator of heaven and earth or taken note of any other specific work of His hands. You see, this is the meaning of the words 'The things that are known of God are manifest in them.' But where and how? Answer: _The invisible things of God are clearly seen in the things that have been made_. One can see how one man helps another, one animal another, yes, how one thing helps and assists another, according as it has superior power and ability. At all times the higher and the more privileged one helps or suppresses the lower and less privileged one. Therefore, there must be that in the universe which is above all and helps all. People measure God by the blessings they receive. This is also why people in ancient times made gods of those who showed them benevolence. In this way, they wanted to thank them, as Pliny says.

...

"But how many people are there even today who worship God not as God but as something that they have imagined in their own hearts! Just look at all our strange, superstitious practices, products of utter vanity. Or is it not exchanging the glory of God into the likeness of an image and fanciful figure if you refuse to do the things which it is your duty to do and if you honor Him with a work which you have chosen yourselves and in so doing you imagine God is the kind who has regard for you and your ways, as if He were different from the way He has revealed Himself to you by giving you commandments? Thus even today many people are being given up to their ovvn base mind, as we see and hear. "\Ne He can also simply say: They did not honor Him as God,' that is, they did not honor Him as it was fitting for them to render to Him honor and thanks. The word 'not' denies the act of honoring Him as it would have been fitting. But if 'not' negates the adverb 'as,' then according to the first interpretation the act of glorifying is admitted and the manner that would have been proper is denied. What follows can be applied conveniently to both interpretations" (LW, 25: Lectures on Romans: 157 ff.).

...