Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Wiki Markup
I've asked elsewhere (8 June 20(4) whether the basic distinction 
shouldn't be that between "the being of God \[or  ultimate reality\]  in itself"  and 
"the meaning of God \[or ultimate reality\] for  us." 
I've asked elsewhere (8 June 2004) whether the basic distinction shouldn't be that between "the being of God \[or ultimate reality\]  in itself" and  "the meaning of God \[or ultimate reality\] for us." 

Wiki Markup
Assuming, as I do, that the second term means more explicitly,  "the  meaning for us of the being of God \[or ultimate reality\] in itself," one should  say that the meaning of God (or ultimate reality) for us is the meaning for us  of God's (or  ultimate reality's)  being unfathomable mystery as well as  ultraintelligible reason or word. 7May 2005
Assuming, as

7 May 2005