Versions Compared

Old Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Michelle Rosenstock

Saved on

compared with

New Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Andrew Scrimgeour

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

5. This is why the formula for any type of a priori christology properly reads:
x, for any possible value of x, can be truly asserted to be ofd of d-ecisive significance for human existence if, and only if, x is not only a fully real human being, but also . .. [whatever else, according to the type of a priori christology in question, is necessary to x's being the decisive re-presentation of the meaning of ultimate reality for us, or, alternatively, the explicit, primal, ontic source authorizing a particular faith/witness of faith/religion].

...