“You Are What You Speak”

CSEM 1, Section 21

Monday/Friday 12-12:50

Drew University - Fall 2010

 

Professor: Elise DuBord

Office: Brothers College 212

Office Phone: 973-408-3615

E-mail: edubord@drew.edu

Office Hours: Tuesday 11-12:30, Thursday 9-10:30, or by appointment

 

Course Description:

What is the role of language in defining membership in a society? Do you need to speak English to be an American? In this course, students will explore the intersection between language and society by examining how the language(s) we speak and how we speak them influence our place in society. We will discuss several controversial language issues in the United States, such as our lack of an official national language, the English Only movement, bilingual education, and the growth of Spanish throughout the country. We will also explore how language varieties such as Chicano English, African American Vernacular English (i.e. Ebonics), or Valley Girl English mark their speakers as being members of a particular social group. 

 

College Seminar Learning Objectives
Upon completion of the College Seminar, students will be able to:

 

Academic Accommodations
Should you require academic accommodations, you must file a request with the Office of Educational Affairs (BC 114, extension 3327). It is your responsibility to self-identify with the Office of Educational Affairs and to provide me with the appropriate documentation from that office at least one week prior to any request for specific course accommodations.  There are no retroactive accommodations.

 

Academic Integrity
All work in the College Seminar must adhere to the College Standards on Academic Integrity. You must do your own work. You must cite sources appropriately in all papers and presentations. You must acknowledge the contribution of other students to your work. Any student who is in violation of this policy will be referred to the Dean’s Office for further action. The policy can be found at: http://www.depts.drew.edu/composition/Academic_Honesty.htm]
Grading Policy
The College Seminar is a collective exploration of a topic.  Its success depends on the thorough preparation and participation of each of its members.  Missing class means depriving yourself of the insights you will gain through discussion and depriving others in the room of your contributions.  Therefore students are expected to be present at each meeting of the seminar and prepared to participate fully in the conversation.  The College Seminar will be graded as follows:

Attendance and Participation  50% 
Students will not be penalized for absences covered by a Drew Policy (Religious Observance, Athletics, Serious Illness, Death in the Family) (e.g. Athletes are allowed a maximum of two absences, i.e. x/24 rather than x/26). However, it is possible for a student to miss so many classes that they cannot be considered to have taken the class and will not earn credit for it. Participation will be evaluated on the basis of a rubric.

Each student will assign themselves a grade at the end of each class period. The professor will assign each student a participation grade on a scale from 0-10, taking your self-evaluation into consideration. Your active participation is expected during every class session and will be evaluated each day based on your participation, preparation, and respect for others in the classes. Student will receive a “0” for each day absent.

 

10

8-9

6-7

0-5

Preparation

Shows evidence of having read/engaged fully with the material being discussed, including preliminary reflection, interpretation and analysis.

Shows evidence of having read/engaged with the material being discussed, including preliminary thought about implications, but no interpretation or analysis.

Shows evidence of having read/engaged with the material being discussed, but no evidence of preliminary reflection, interpretation and/or analysis.

Shows no evidence of having read/engaged with the material being discussed.

Contribution

Participates actively, without having to be called upon; offers meaningful contribution.

Participates only when called upon; offers meaningful contribution.

Participates only when called upon; offers minimal contribution.

Student is present, but is mentally absent and not contributing.

Critical Inquiry

Asks and poses questions in direct connection to the material being discusses.

Asks and poses questions that indirectly or broadly refer to the material being discussed

Asks and poses questions with very limited or no connection to the material being discussed.

Does not ask or pose any questions.

 

Course Assignments 50% (NOTE:  No extra credit will be offered in this class.)

 

Portfolio 40% (Due Friday, December 3)

Formal writing (20%)

Reflection and self-assessment (5%)

Writing to Learn assignments (15%)

Linguistic Landscape group project (10%)

DoNUt and Library Training.  This seminar is designed with the assumption that you will have completed both the orientation to the Drew Computing environment (DoNUT) and the orientation to basic use of the Drew Library, both of which are a part of the Common Hour, within the first four weeks of the semester.

 

Grade Distribution

A         93-100                         C+       77-79

A-        90-92                           C         73-76

B+       87-89                           C-        70-72

B         83-86                           D+       67-69

B-        80-82                           D         63-66

                                                D-        60-62

                                                U         0-59

 

Course Policies

 

Daily Course Schedule

NOTE: This is a tentative schedule for the semester. Daily written assignments will be regularly posted on Moddle. Assignments and due dates are subject to change. It is your responsibility to regularly check the Moodle page for this class in the event of any changes I might make.

 

It is the students’ responsibility to find readings that are available on-line through the Drew library webpage. You will learn how to do this in class. All readings that are not available electronically will be posted as .pdf files on the Moodle site for this course. 

 

Topic 1- Language policy in the U.S. / Bilingual education

Week 1

August 30  - First day of class

September 3

Sandra Del Valle: “A History of Language Rights: Between Tolerance and Hostility” (Intro, Language Rights, Ohio, Penn, California, New Mexico) Language Rights and Law in the United States: Finding our Voices. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2003, p. 9-17.

Week 2

September 6 – Labor Day (no class)

September 10

Ana Celia Zentella “Language policy/Planning and the U.S. Colonialism: The Puerto Rican Thorn in English-Only’s side” Edited by Thom Huebner and Kathryn A Davis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing p. 155-164

Week 3

September 13

Friederike Baer “Speaking American” American History. August 2007 p. 60-64.

September 17

Eduardo Hernández-Chávez. “Language policy in the United States: A history of cultural genocide” in Skutnabb-Gangas, Tove and Robert Phillipson. Linguistic Human Rights. Berlin: Monton de Gruyter. 1995, p. 141-158

 

Week 4

September 20

María B. Martin. “Language Policy and the Meskwaki Schooling Experience, 1857-2002” American Educational History Journal, 30, 2003, p. 99-106.

September 24

Schildkraut, Deborah J. “Official-English and the States: Influences on Declaring English the Official Language in the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 54:2 (2001) 445-457. 2001

 

Week 5

September 27

Explore the website for U.S. English: http://www.us-english.org/

Watch the debate about Official English language policy from News Hour with the president of U.S. English Mauro Mujica and linguist Carmen Fought.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/social_issues/jan-june06/english_05-23.html (click on streaming video)

October 1

Topic 2 – Standard English, Language Ideologies, Language Discrimination

Rosina Lippi-Green. “The Standard Language Myth” English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge, 1997, p. 54-62.

“American Accents”

Week 6

October 4

John R. Rickford “Suite for Ebony and Phonics” Originally published in Discover magazine in Dec. 1997. Accessed at: http://www.stanford.edu/~rickford/papers/SuiteForEbonyAndPhonics.html

October 8

Glenn A. Martinez. “Language Ideologies” Mexican Americans and Language: Del dicho al hecho. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. p. 3-19.

Week 7

October 11

Margalit Fox “The way we live now: On language; Dialect” New York Times. Sept. 12, 1999. Accessed at: http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/12/magazine/the-way-we-live-now-9-12-99-on-language-dialects.html?scp=8&sq=&pagewanted=all

Miriam Jordan “Arizona Grades Teachers on Fluency” The Wall Street Journal. April 30, 2010. Accessed at:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575213883276427528.html?KEYWORDS=arizona+grades+teachers+on+fluency

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575213883276427528.html?KEYWORDS=arizona+grades+teachers+on+fluency

Amy Fountain, Thomas Bever and Michael Hammond. Barring teachers with ‘accents' from teaching English is misguided" Arizona Daily Star July 13, 2010, Accessed at: http://azstarnet.com/news/opinion/article_bfb4230b-43b0-5e92-975a-580456386279.html

October 15

Rosina Lippi-Green. “Teaching children how to discriminate: What we learn from the Big Bad Wolf.” English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge, 1997, p. 79-103.

Yvonne Villarreal “Dora: The pint-sized superstar” Los Angeles Times August 7, 2010 Accessed at: http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-ca-dora-20100808,0,7198597.story

 

Week 8

October 18 – Reading Days (no class)

Wednesday, October 20 – Monday classes meet

Topic 3 – The status of languages other than English in the United States

Eliane Rubinstein-Avila. Brazilian Portuguese in Massachusetts’s Linguistic Landscape: A Prevalent yet Understudied Phenomenon. Hispania 88.4 (2005) 873-888.

October 22

Jia Jackie Lou “Chinese on the Side: The Marginalization of Chinese in the Linguistic and Social Landscapes of Chinatown in Washington, DC” Elana Shohamy, Eliezer Ben-Rafael and Monica Barni (eds.) Linguistic Landscapes in the City Brisol UK: Mulilingual Matters, 2010, p. 96-113.

Week 9

October 25

Background research for Linguistic Landscape Project

October 29

Ningsheng Xia “Maintenance of the Chinese Language in the United States” Bilingual Review/La Revista Bilingüe 17.3 (1992) 195-209.

Yuliya Chernova “Chinese on Menu for Elementary Kids” The Wall Street Journal September 27, 2010. Accessed at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704082104575516082963460938.html?KEYWORDS=chinese+on+menu+for+elementary+kids

Week 10

Nov. 1

Aleya Rouchdy “Language Conflict and Identity: Arabic in the American Diaspora” Studies in Linguistic Sciences 31.1 (2001) 77-93.

Note: You can skip the section on “Borrowings and Interference” p. 81-85.

Tanveer Ali. “Dearborn schools urged to ban Arabic” The Detroit News January 15, 2009.

Accessed at: http://detnews.com/article/20090115/SCHOOLS/901150395/Dearborn-schools-urged-to-ban-Arabic

Nov. 5

 

Carole M. Berotte Joseph “Haitians in the U.S.: Language, Politics & Education” Arthur K. Spears and Carole M. Berotte Joseph (eds.) The Haitian Creole Language: History, Structure, Use, and Education. Landham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010.

 

 

Week 11

Nov. 8

            Presentation of Linguistic Landscape projects in class

Nov. 12

Topic 4 – Language and Identity 

Carmen Fought “Language and the construction of Ethnic Identity” Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 19-33.

 

Week 12

Nov. 15

Sonja L. Lanehart “African American Language” Handbook of language and ethnic identity: Disciplinary and regional perspectives. Vol 1. Joshua A Fishman and Ofelia García (eds.) Oxford: Oxford UP. 2010. p. 340-352

Nov. 19

Carmen Fought “Are White people ethnic?: Whiteness, dominance, and ethnicity” Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 112-131.

Note: Read first part of chapter p. 112-121(Intro, Social Correlates of Being White, Linguistic Correlates of Being White, Consequences of Sounding White)

 

Week 13

Nov. 22

Carmen Fought “Are White people ethnic?: Whiteness, dominance, and ethnicity” Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 121-131.

Note: Read second part of chapter p.121-131(Humor and the Portrayal of Whiteness)

Nov. 26 – Thanksgiving break (no class)

Week 14

Nov. 29

Gloria Anzaldúa “How to tame a wild Tongue” Borderlands/La Frontera: The new Mestiza San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books. P. 75-86.

Dec. 3 – Last day of College Seminar

Reading: TBA

Name:___________________________

Daily Participation – College Seminar “You are what you speak” – Fall 2010

Week

Monday
Self-Evaluation

Friday
Self-Evaluation

Weekly
Self-Evaluation

Professor’s Weekly Evaluation

1





2

-----------------------




3





4





5





6





7





8

Wed.




9





10





11





12





13


---------------------



14





Background Research for Linguistic Landscape Project

Complete the three research components and the W2L for Monday, October 25.

 

  1. Consult American Factfinder (factfinder.census.gov) and look at the Fact Sheets for the community you are going to visit. The sheets include number and percent of specific races, foreign born, speaking language other than English at home, etc.  (For smaller divisions such as towns - like Madison - the data is drawn from the 2000 census.  For counties, it's coming from the 2006-2008 community survey estimates.) Look at the details page for the Social Characteristics (immigration, country of origin, language, education, etc) and the Demographic Characteristics (ethnicity/race, etc).
  2. Look for an article in Academic Search Premier in a popular media publication (in a newspaper or news magazine like Time or Newsweek) to find out more about the language and/or ethnolinguistic group you will be observing in the place you will visit. Here’s how to find the Academic Search Premier on the Library’s webpage:

Possible search terms: the name of the language, the ethnolinguistic group, neighborhood, city, county or state, etc. You will get both academic articles and popular news media results in your search, but you can stick to reading something from the popular media about the language or ethnolinguistic group.

  1. Surf the web and look for information on a business or organization (restaurant, school, community center, social services, non-profit organizations, supermarket, etc.) that serves the ethnolinguistic group you are researching. What kind of business or organization is it? How do they serve the community? Does their website have information in more than one language?

W2L: Write a summary of your findings in preparation for your visit to this community. What is the ethnolinguistic composition of the community? What is the history of this particular group in the community? Where might you see visual representations of the language? Where might you hear the language?

 

 

Linguistic Landscape Project – Community Visit

What to do when your group visits the community:

 

 

(Note to College Seminar instructors: Students chose the places they wanted to explore: Ironbound (Newark), Little Italy (NYC), Chinatown (NYC), and Speedwell Avenue (Morristown). Each group got themselves to their destinations on their own, primarily using public transportation. There was at least one native-speaker or student of the particular language analyzed in each of the groups: Portuguese, Italian, Chinese, and Spanish. Students really enjoyed doing this project.)

 

Linguistic Landscape Project – Group Presentation