The Notebooks of Schubert Ogden

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

SCANNED PDF

If "it is trifling with philosophical problems to accept as valid questions 
arid answers that have no conceivable bearing on how we propose to live" 
(TO:  373 f.),  then how can any "speculative philosophy," or "categorial 
metaphysics,"  escape the charge of "trifling" in this sense? 
If "it is trifling with philosophical problems to accept as valid questions and answers that have no conceivable bearing on how we propose to live" (TO:373 f.),  then how can any "speculative philosophy," or "categorial metaphysics," escape the charge of "trifling" in this sense? 

So, too, if "the pragmatic principle [holds] that a metaphysics must be livable, must have a  reasonable relation to how one lives" (PCH:  687), how can any "categorial metaphysics"  as such, i.e., as distinct from the transcendental metaphysics it necessarily implies, possibly pass muster as a valid metaphysics? 

February 1998

  • No labels