The Notebooks of Schubert Ogden

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

scanned pdf

Just as Hartshorne speaks of "atheism" in many places as though it had to be "empirical atheism," only to allow in at least some places that it may also be "logical" (in which case it's equivalent to "positivism"), so he also speaks of "falsification" in many places as though it, too, had to be "empirical," only to allow in at least some places that it can be "logical not empirical" (cf., e.g., ZF: 81).

5 October 2004

  • No labels