The Notebooks of Schubert Ogden

PDF Version of this Document

It seems to me now that my earlier characterization of the traditional way of doing theology as a form of rationalization rather than critical reflection can and should be improved upon.

Although it's not entirely wide of the mark, a more accurate characterization, I think, is that doing theology in the traditional way is a matter of reasoning from positions already taken, or assumed to be valid, rather than reasoning for them. Simply accepting certain criteria as valid, one then reasons from them as, in effect, axioms from which certain theorems can be validly deduced.
Such is precisely what I mean by reflecting, or appropriating, relatively less rather than more critically. On the other hand, to reflect, or appropriate, more rather than less critically is to concern oneself with critically validating the axioms.

17 November 2008

  • No labels