Title: Section 20: On the Systematic Ambiguity of Bearing Witness, 674-696  
Author: Lashyia Meeks Jun 08, 2010
Last Changed by: Andrew Scrimgeour Feb 23, 2018
Tiny Link: (useful for email) https://uknow.drew.edu/confluence/x/UoH7
Export As: Word · PDF  
Hierarchy
Parent Page
    Page: Schubert M. Ogden Notebooks
Children (23)
    Page: 674. It is one question whether what a person says and does is a consequence of saving faith ...
    Page: 675. My taking something to be revelation doesn't make it revelation, even though . . .
    Page: 676. I have argued that "taking something to be revelation actually involves a double ...
    Page: 677. I argued some time ago that "one must be careful not to mislocate the 'objective' component ...
    Page: 678. There is a problem with Knox's statement that "only in the experience of those who receive...
    Page: 679. According to Bultmann, the apostolic word, like the apostles themselves, belongs to the salvation ...
    Page: 680. There is little doubt that "the particular historical experience" that I take to be required in order...
    Page: 681. Whether or not X so experiences Y that Y becomes a revelation or act of God for X depends ...
    Page: 682. It occurs to me that my distinction between "the Jesus of history as a fact of the past," ...
    Page: 683. As I understand Luther's christological reflections, there is a distinction to be made between res ...
Labels
There are no labels assigned to this page.
Recent Changes
Time Editor  
Feb 23, 2018 09:55 Andrew Scrimgeour View Changes
Jan 13, 2017 15:52 Andrew Scrimgeour View Changes
Jun 12, 2014 11:32 Jennifer Heise View Changes
Jun 08, 2010 17:36 Lashyia Meeks View Changes
Migrated to Confluence 4.0
Jun 08, 2010 17:36 Lashyia Meeks