The Notebooks of Schubert Ogden

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Scanned PDF

What are the different logically possible answers to the question, "Do you have any reasons to assert or deny p?"
1.
I have reasons to assert p.
2.
I have reasons not to deny p.
3.
I have no reasons to deny p.
4.
I have no reasons to assert p.
5.
I have reasons not to assert p.
6.
I have reasons to deny p.
Realtive to asserting p, 2 is stronger than 3, and 1 is stronger than 2. Similarly, relative to denying p, 5 is stronger than 4, and 6 is stronger than 5.
By "stronger than" I mean "requires more or better reasons than." Thus to assert p requires having more or better reasons than not to deny p, which itself require.s having more or better reasons than having no reasons to deny p. And so, too, with denying P, which requires having more or better reasons than not to assert p, which itself requires having more or better reasons than having no reasons to assert p.
3 December 2000; rev. 24 June 2009

  • No labels