The Notebooks of Schubert Ogden

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

scanned pdf

If Hartshorne is right, as I believe he is, that "[o]nly religion and philosophy can give human life a human meaning" ("The Ethics of Contributionism": 106 f.), then, surely, it must be "philosophy," not merely "metaphysics," that becomes necessary as and when, with the development of science and critical r~ction, "myth" is no longer able to perform its most essential function. The choice, in other words, is not, as Hartshorne says, between myth and metaphysics, but between myth and philosophy ("Hartshorne on Religion and Metaphysics": 1b).
5 February 1998
Actually, Hartshorne is wrong (and I alll wrong in believing him right!) insofar as religion and philosophy do not give human life a hUlllan meaning, except in the sense that they explicate, or re-present, what really does give human life a hUlllan meaning-naillely, things as they really are, in their structure in theillselves as well as in their meaning for us.
3 May 2009

  • No labels