The Notebooks of Schubert Ogden

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

scanned pdf

Hartshorne distinguishes between "monadic or non-relative predicates" and "relative predicates" ("The Divine Relativity and Absoluteness: A Reply": 32; d. also 58 in the same essay, where he distinguishes between "relational" and "monadic" predicates).
Isn't it fair to suppose that just as "non-relative" predicates can also be said to be "monadic/-presumably in Peirce's sense of the term-so "relative" (or "relational") predicates could, quite properly, also be said to be "dyadic" again, in Peirce's sense of the term?
6 October 2004

  • No labels