Page Information

    Page: 1569. I've been clear for some time that the distinction . . .
    Page: 1570. Granted that one is misleading as well as misled . . .
    Page: 1571. Philosophy, understood classically, may be said to be . . .
    Page: 1572. What is philosophy? . . .
    Page: 1573. Note how, in the whole discussion of what philosophy is . . .
    Page: 1574. One interesting, if not sharply clear and . . .
    Page: 1575. Philosophy is commonly reckoned to belong to . . .
    Page: 1576. Let philosophy be understood as critical reflection . . .
    Page: 1577. "Philosophy" in general is a more or less reflective . . .
    Page: 1578. I want to hold that transcendental metaphysics . . .
    Page: 1579. What Does It All Mean?
    Page: 1580. I have said elsewhere that philosophy . . .
    Page: 1581. "Philosophy begins in wonder."
    Page: 1582. What are the necessary conditions of properly . . .
    Page: 1583. Philosophy is to religion and culture generally . . .
    Page: 1584. Theology, like philosophy, is a matter of fully . . .
    Page: 1585. On my old question as to the exact relation . . .
    Page: 1586. Task: To work out more clearly than I as yet . . .
    Page: 1587. What is the relation between . . .
    Page: 1588. According to Hartshorne, "Philosophy is reasoning . . .
    Page: 1589. What is philosophy?
    Page: 1590. What exactly are the differences between philosophy . . .
    Page: 1591. Whitehead and Hartshorne both, in their ways . . .
    Page: 1592. According to Hartshorne, there is a distinction . . .
    Page: 1593. What is it to be wise? . . .
    Page: 1594. What, exactly, does the wisdom of which philosophy . . .
    Page: 1595. Does the wisdom of which philosophy is the love . . .
    Page: 1596. If theology is to wisdom somewhat as metaphysics . . .
    Page: 1597. When Hartshorne talks about philosophy . . .
    Page: 1598. If Philosophy exists primarily to show us what . . .
    Page: 1599. Philosophy in its first, purely formal, analytic phase . . .
    Page: 1600. Is philosophy "hot" (religious) or . . .
    Page: 1601. If philosophy can be appropriately defined as . . .
    Page: 1602. Philosophy is not a mere collection of noble sentiments . . .
    Page: 1603. On the Question of What is Philosophy
    Page: 1604. As for the objection that I so understand philosophy . . .
    Page: 1605. If the activity of philosophy itself has . . .
    Page: 1606. John Wilson on Philosophy . . .
    Page: 1607. On Questions
    Page: 1608. Philosophical Study of Religion
    Page: 1609. A Philosophy of Religion: Some Theses
    Page: 1610. Some More Theses
    Page: 1611. Four Presuppositions' Concerning Religion
    Page: 1612.What constitutes a religion?...
    Page: 1613. The constitution of a religious community . . .
    Page: 1614. All religions have to do with the constitution . . .
    Page: 1615. Any religion is constituted as such by some . . .
    Page: 1616. I have argued that "all religions have to do with . . .
    Page: 1618. How do the adherents of a religion . . .
    Page: 1619. Bearing witness is appropriate to the explicit . . .
    Page: 1620. What bearing witness counts in principle . . .
    Page: 1621. Is doing empirical-historical research necessary...
    Page: 1622. Why do I hold that a religion can claim . . .
    Page: 1623. What is it to be "religious"?
    Page: 1624. Any religion as such explicitly formulates . . .
    Page: 1625. Religion is a "cultural system" . . .
    Page: 1626. A religion makes or implies a claim to decisive . . .
    Page: 1627. The issue that concerns me here is how to . . .
    Page: 1628. It is true that religion has a metaphysical aspect . . .
    Page: 1629. If religion may be defined generically as . . .
    Page: 1630. It's obvious, but it may be worth remarking . . .
    Page: 1631. Bultmann argues . . .
    Page: 1632. Does it not belong to the very concept . . .
    Page: 1633. Does not each of the axial religions presuppose . . .
    Page: 1634. The axial religions all agree in claiming . . .
    Page: 1635. All axial religions are formally the same . . .
    Page: 1636. How should the concept "religio vera" . . .
    Page: 1637. It is at best misleading to say that the true . . .
    Page: 1638. What, exactly, do I understand by "the true religion"?
    Page: 1639. In at least one place, I distinguish religion . . .
    Page: 1640. The basic insight to be pursued in these reflections . . .
    Page: 1641. I have written that "'the true religion'. . . could be . . .
    Page: 1642. Philosophy and religion differ, I've argued . . .
    Page: 1643. The traditional revisionary insistence that what is normative . . .
    Page: 1644. have usually operated with the distinction between . . .
    Page: 1645.The question of the formal structure of religious authority . . .
    Page: 1646. It's worth remembering that I have more than once . . .
    Page: 1647. Pluralists seem ever to confuse truths with claims . . .
    Page: 1648. On the Pragmatic Criterion of Truth
    Page: 1649.The Gnostic and the apocalyptic ways of thinking may...
    Page: 1650. On the A Priori as Dynamic
    Page: 1651. On Strata of Meaning in Religious Discourse
    Page: 1652. Existentialist Analysis, Metaphysics, and Religion
    Page: 1653. Is agnosticism about religious truth a necessary . . .
    Page: 1654 . On Analyzing Credenda and Agenda as Expressions of Faith
    Page: 1655. All religions summon one to live realistically . . .
    Page: 1656. It seems clear upon reflection that . . .
    Page: 1657. What is my distinction between constitutivist and representativist . . .
    Page: 1658. Dewey, significantly, distinguishes two conceits . . .
    Page: 1659. What Dewey says about our sense of the whole . . .
    Page: 1660. Some Thoughts about Santayana's "Natural and Ultimate Religion"
    Page: 1661. I'm now convinced that Wittgenstein's authority can . . .
    Page: 1662. Were I ever to feel the need for yet further expert . . .
    Page: 1663. What is at stake for me in defining "religion". . .
    Page: 1664. George Santayana, "Natural and Ultimate Religion" . . .
    Page: 1665. What about applying a pragmatist . . .
    Page: 1666. Some years ago I asked whether . . .
    Page: 1667. It's worth keeping in mind that the use of such terms as . . .
    Page: 1668. If I have correctly understood my analysis of . . .
    Page: 1669. Could it be that the real difference between a religion . . .
    Page: 1670. The question I want an answer to is . . .
    Page: 1671. Religion as such necessarily presupposes that . . .
    Page: 1672. It appears evident that I need to rethink . . .
    Page: 1673. It is commonly thought that religion can be defined . . .
    Page: 1674. "Religious ideas claim to be the concrete form of . . .
    Page: 1675. Experience is the source of meanings and concepts
    Page: 1676. Our ordinary experience has two principal dimensions . . .
    Page: 1677. What do we actually experience in the vertical . . .
    Page: 1678. What is it that we experience in the existential . . .
    Page: 1679. Sometimes I've thought and written as though . . .
    Page: 1680. I have said (e.g., in "Theology without Metaphysics?") . . .
    Page: 1681. Isn't what my view comes to something . . .
    Page: 1682. Language is properly said to function existentially . . .
    Page: 1683. What is "the fundamental situation disclosed in experience"?
    Page: 1684. Experience, according to Webster's Dictionary . . .
    Page: 1685. Experience is always experience of . . .
    Page: 1686. Just as an experience is always an experience of . . .
    Page: 1687. Both existentials and transcendentals are experienced . . .
    Page: 1688. It's now clear to me that my reflection on . . .
    Page: 1689. Any existential self-understanding . . .
    Page: 1690. Faith is or involves an existential . . .
    Page: 1691. Christian faith in the subjective meaning of . . .
    Page: 1692. Using Whitehead's distinction, one may say that . . .
    Page: 1693. Any language addressed, directly or indirectly . . .
    Page: 1694. In my own way, I have long since distinguished between . . .
    Page: 1695. We ask intellectual questions because . . .
    Page: 1696. There is no need to state or imply . . .
    Page: 1697. Human beings ask both vital questions and . . .
    Page: 1698. Could it be that what distinguishes wisdom . . .
    Page: 1699. The priority of experience to reason is irreversible . . .
    Page: 1700. On "Ultimate Reality"
    Page: 1701. What is "ultimate reality"? . . .
    Page: 1702. Human existence is the actualization somehow . . .
    Page: 1703. To be human is not merely to live but to . . .
    Page: 1704. Our fragmentariness as human beings is not . . .
    Page: 1705. Our original call to be a human being is . . .
    Page: 1706. What is it to ask about life's meaning? . . .
    Page: 1707. Among all the animals, we human beings are . . .
    Page: 1708. What is the aim of life?
    Page: 1709. Man makes himself . . .
    Page: 1710. Right from the start, man's creativity . . .
    Page: 1711. On the Different Senses of "Transcendence," . . .
    Page: 1712. If I have correctly understood my analysis of . . .
    Page: 1713. Whether strictly ultimate reality is defined as . . .
    Page: 1714. I have argued elsewhere . . .
    Page: 1715. On my analysis, to live as a human being . . .
    Page: 1716. On Basic Confidence in the Worth of Life
    Page: 1717. Shouldn't one distinguish between two types of "secularism"?
    Page: 1718. For a long time now, I've thought that our basic . . .
    Page: 1719. The most basic use or function of "God" . . .
    Page: 1720. Hartshorne says . . .
    Page: 1721. I find it interesting that just as Whitehead . . .
    Page: 1722. What is the difference, if any, between the metaphysical . . .
    Page: 1723. I have argued elsewhere that an adequate . . .
    Page: 1724. We need to distinguish between philosophical . . .
    Page: 1725. On Science, Morality, and Religion
    Page: 1726.Faith, Religion (PART OF THE PDF FILE CAN'T BE READ)
    Page: 1727. Ethical Queries About Modern Science
    Page: 1728. A debate about science is one thing . . .
    Page: 1729. Science, Technology, Religion, and Theology
    Page: 1730. The Convergences of Science and Religion
    Page: 1731. Process Philosophy and the Convergences of Science and Religion
    Page: 1732. Science and Religion: Issues of Convergence
    Page: 1733. What, exactly, are "presuppositions"?
    Page: 1734. On Needs and Interests
    Page: 1735. There is a distinction to be made between . . .
    Page: 1736. How does one respond to the objection that . . .
    Page: 1737. What does it mean to say, x implies y?
    Page: 1738. What is a Concept?
    Page: 1739. The essence or individuality of God is given as a . . .
    Page: 1740. Theism, in a proper form, makes life . . .
    Page: 1741. There are Christian theologians and philosophers . . .
    Page: 1742. To the existence of what God do the so-called proofs . . .
    Page: 1743. Faith, both as trust and as loyalty . . .
    Page: 1744. What is the proper form of the cosmological argument . . .
    Page: 1745. If x is the all-worshipful, x must be . . .
    Page: 1746. What form ought the argument from design to take?
    Page: 1747. Ontological Argument
    Page: 1748. Teleological Argument
    Page: 1749. Cosmological Argument
    Page: 1750. Everything, Something, and Nothing
    Page: 1751. It is inappropriate to ask . . .
    Page: 1752. How Does One Speak in Secular Fashion of God?
    Page: 1753. On "the Euthyphro 'dilemma'"
    Page: 1754. Concerning the Senses of "Symbol"
    Page: 1755. Could it be that "theory" . . .
    Page: 1756. I remain convinced that the proper use of the term "theoretical" . . .
    Page: 1757. On the Whole Point of Theory and of Praxis
    Page: 1758. It seems clear that the orthodox distinction . . .
    Page: 1759. I have allowed that a distinction is to be made . . .
    Page: 1760. Existence" is yet another term having different . . .
    Page: 1761. On the Senses of "Theory" and "Praxis"
    Page: 1762. The Senses of "Intellectual" and Its Cognates
    Page: 1763. "Interpretation" can be understood . . .
    Page: 1764. I wonder whether "experience" may not be . . .
    Page: 1765. If "interpretation" and "experience" . . .
    Page: 1766. I wonder whether "categorial" may . . .
    Page: 1767. "Assertion" is evidently ambiguous . . .
    Page: 1768. The statement that we never have facts . . .
    Page: 1769. According to the analysis on which . . .
    Page: 1770. What do I mean when I claim . . .
    Page: 1771. Obiter Dicta on Truth
    Page: 1772. E. J. Dionne, Jr. has wisely written . . .
    Page: 1773. On "True" and "Authentic"
    Page: 1774. On "Authentic," etc.
    Page: 1775. Language has many uses . . .
    Page: 1776. According to Thomas Aquinas . . .
    Page: 1777. Lynch on Truth
    Page: 1778. How does one determine the criterion . . .
    Page: 1779. My question, as I try to think further about "truth" . . .
    Page: 1780. We need a concept of truth in order to . . .
    Page: 1781. Verificationism, as a theory of truth, is wrong.
    Page: 1782. When one says that a belief . . .
    Page: 1783. To claim that a belief is true is to claim . . .
    Page: 1784. "Structures, that is, relations of relations" . . .
    Page: 1785. On "Being"
    Page: 1786. The concept of "substantial agreement" . . .
    Page: 1787. To what extent is there a correspondence . . .
    Page: 1788. I too often proceed as though there were only . . .
    Page: 1789. On the Three Types of Science
    Page: 1790. I have often said that the sciences . . .
    Page: 1791. I more and more see the need . . .
    Page: 1792. What is the difference between the social sciences . . .
    Page: 1793. Isn't there an important distinction to be made . . .
    Page: 1794. Nygren argues that . . .
    Page: 1795. There is a striking convergence between Hartshorne's . . .
    Page: 1796. Isn't Hartshorne's talk of . . .
    Page: 1797. All three of the basic scientific methods . . .
    Page: 1798. I seem to recall Dewey saying somewhere . . .
    Page: 1799. The sciences and metaphysics . . .
    Page: 1800. Science proceeds inductively . . .
    Page: 1801. Science is concerned with structure as distinct . . .
    Page: 1802. I have typically argued that critical reflection . . .
    Page: 1803. A good statement on the distinctive character . . .
    Page: 1804. On "the Common Sense of the Subject"
    Page: 1805. More on "the Common Sense of the Subject"
    Page: 1806. In his classic dissent in the Abrams case . . .
    Page: 1807. Democracy is government of the people . . .
    Page: 1808. That there is a "higher law," in the sense . . .
    Page: 1809. Already for the Greeks . . .
    Page: 1810. I want to say that the Declaration of Independence . . .
    Page: 1811. Is it true that we, as Americans, are . . .
    Page: 1812. Any American is free to believe . . .
    Page: 1813. What's really going on when Reinhold Niebuhr . . .
    Page: 1814. According to the Enlightenment . . .
    Page: 1815. Concerning the point I've made about . . .
    Page: 1816. What do heirs of the Enlightenment . . .
    Page: 1817. The most fundamental human right is . . .
    Page: 1818. I have argued, together with Gamwell . . .
    Page: 1819. What does it mean to say, x implies y?
    Page: 1820. For me, the key to thinking clearly about . . .
    Page: 1821. The purpose of framing and ratifying . . .
    Page: 1822. Some Thoughts on Liberalism
    Page: 1823. I have argued that "no interpretation of the" . . .
    Page: 1824. What are the necessary conditions of . . .
    Page: 1825. Brümmer argues that "two factual presuppositions . . .
    Page: 1826. Isaiah Berlin says in his essay, "Two Concepts of Liberty" . . .
    Page: 1827. Justice Holmes speaks of men's possibly . . .
    Page: 1828. The important philosophical question raised by . . .
    Page: 1829. The foundations of the Republic may be said . . .
    Page: 1830. What is properly meant by "the Union"?
    Page: 1831.The foundations of the Republic . . . (REPEATED AT 1829)
    Page: 1832. On a religious interpretation of democracy . . .
    Page: 1833. There are two issues . . .
    Page: 1834. One of the points stressed by Stephen Ambrose . . .
    Page: 1835. What is the Enlightenment?
    Page: 1836. The following passage from the Federalist . . .
    Page: 1837. Is there any such thing as human equality?
    Page: 1838. Wherein does human equality consist?
    Page: 1839. Niebuhr claims, perhaps correctly, that . . .
    Page: 1840. What, exactly, is civil society?
    Page: 1841.The formation of civil society presupposes...
    Page: 1842. Lynch is certainly right that . . .
    Page: 1843. Liberalism is the view that human beings...
    Page: 1844. Constitutionalism is the rule of law . . .
    Page: 1845. On Samuel H. Beer's "To Make a Nation"
    Page: 1846. On my understanding, what Beer means by . . .
    Page: 1847. If I have correctly understood them . . .
    Page: 1848. There are four instances of explicit God-talk . . .
    Page: 1849. What Do We Mean by Faith in American Public Life?
    Page: 1850. Having read Gamwell's Democratic Religion . . .
    Page: 1851. The Constitution presupposes . . .
    Page: 1852. But, clearly, the Constitution also presupposes . . .
    Page: 1853. Modern defenders of universal human rights . . .
    Page: 1854. Maximizing the good requires social cooperation . . .
    Page: 1855. Gamwell, "The Moral Ground of Cosmopolitan Democracy"
    Page: 1856. Human rights articulate a universal or natural moral law . . .
    Page: 1857. What Gamwell does, in effect . . .
    Page: 1858. There appears to be a problem with Gamwell's reasoning . . .
    Page: 1859. "On Politics as a Christian Vocation"
    Page: 1860. Gamwell says, "In itself . . .
    Page: 1861. We bear (implicit) witness . . .
    Page: 1862. One point that Gamwell doesn't make . . .
    Page: 1863. Gamwell's basic point . . .
    Page: 1864. Why are Christians able to embrace . . .
    Page: 1865. I first thought that Ronald Dworkin's distinction . . .
    Page: 1866. Gamwell says . . .
    Page: 1867. Chris's reply to my criticism
    Page: 1868. If I understand Gamwell's reasoning correctly . . .
    Page: 1869. What is Jaffa's point in his dispute with Bork, Rehnquist, et al . . .
    Page: 1870. The proper provisions of a democratic constitution . . .
    Page: 1871. We the people of the United States of America . . .
    Page: 1872. Further thoughts on Gamwell's distinction . . .
    Page: 1873. What would be the problem . . .
    Page: 1874. Some further thoughts in connection with my Auseinandersetzung with Gamwell . . .
    Page: 1875. Gamwell on the purpose of the state, etc.
    Page: 1876. "Politics" in the broad sense . . .
    Page: 1877. What Is Democracy?
    Page: 1878. Gamwell defines "politics" formally as . . .
    Page: 1879. So far as I can see, there are at least three stages . . .
    Page: 1880. In what sense, if any, is reason . . .
    Page: 1881. Morality and politics, as well as science . . .
    Page: 1882. According to an article on "God and Cyberspace" . . .
    Page: 1883. Houston Smith's criticism of "Process Theology" . . .
    Page: 1884. Perhaps yet another use of Whitehead's notion . . .
    Page: 1885. Some Basic Presuppositions
    Page: 1886. Skepticism is self-contradictory . . .
    Page: 1887. Let realism be the position that . . .
    Page: 1888. Hilary Putnam on Richard Rorty
    Page: 1889. In one of his several different statements about metaphysics . . .
    Page: 1890. I have been struck by the following comments . . .
    Page: 1891. What is the datum of which philosophy . . .
    Page: 1892. There are several matters . . .
    Page: 1893. On Rorty's Historicist PhiIosophy
    Page: 1894. De George says . . .
    Page: 1895. Normal adult perception . . .
    Page: 1896. There are three arguments . . .
    Page: 1897. On Reasoning
    Page: 1898. If x's judgment is trustworthy . . .
    Page: 1899. Some Reflections on Our Knowledge of Other Selves
    Page: 1900. When Hartshorne says . . .
    Page: 1901. On the Distinction between . . .
    Page: 1902. To what extent can the following two lines . . .
    Page: 1903. What is the inclusive object of one's self-understanding . . .
    Page: 1904. According to one traditional scheme . . .
    Page: 1905. To say, as Melanchthon does . . .
    Page: 1906. Why should one allow . . .
    Page: 1907. On Transcendental Deduction as Mode of Argument
    Page: 1908. On The Distinctions between Thought and Speech . . .
    Page: 1909. Self-Understanding, Metaphysics, and Morals . . .
    Page: 1910. To what extent can one properly regard metaphysics . . .
    Page: 1911. On Explanation and Explication . . .
    Page: 1912. On Explanation vs. Description
    Page: 1913. If it is "trifling with philosophical problems . . .
    Page: 1914. To consummate . . .
    Page: 1915. Cultural lag . . .
    Page: 1916. On "Enjoy" (OED) . . .
    Page: 1917. On the Levels of Awareness
    Page: 1918. One understanding of what it is to conceive . . .
    Page: 1919. What are the different logically possible answers . . .
    Page: 1920. In correcting some of my formulations . . .
    Page: 1921. In the past, I have criticized Descartes's definition . . .
    Page: 1922. According to Collingwood
    Page: 1923. Kant seems to me exactly right . . .
    Page: 1924. Kant's sharp criticism of Judaism . . .
    Page: 1925. I quite overlooked . . .
    Page: 1926. Essay to Be Written
    Page: 1927. One insight that l owe . . .
    Page: 1928. Existentialism, in the final analysis . . .
    Page: 1929. Anything actual has at least . . .
    Page: 1930. Value judgments employing gerundive predicates . . .
    Page: 1931. I find it interesting (and supportive!) . . .
    Page: 1932. Evangelical critics of "liberalism" . . .
    Page: 1933. In the Hua-Yen tradition . . .
    Page: 1934. Buddhism in its Northern . . .
    Page: 1935. Meaning-for-Us . . .
    Page: 1936. "Significance" requires analysis in "objective relativist" terms . . .
    Page: 1937. I have become accustomed to distinguishing . . .
    Page: 1938. There is clearly a problem . . .
    Page: 1939. I've asked elsewhere . . .
    Page: 1940. On the Distinction between "Being-in-Itself" and "Meaning-for-Us"
    Page: 1941. What are the promise and the limitations . . .
    Page: 1942. It appears that yet another debt I may owe . . .
    Page: 1943. According to Holub, Habermas uses "reflection" . . .
    Page: 1944. An explicit speech act has a characteristic double structure . . .
    Page: 1945. According to McCarthy, Habermas . . .
    Page: 1946. On my account, the process of appropriating constatives . . .
    Page: 1947. If the tacit presupposition that the claims to validity made . . .
    Page: 1948. Habermas makes, or allows for, a threefold distinction . . .
    Page: 1949. One and the same proposition may constitute the content of either
    Page: 1950. What are dogmas—and, more generally, standards of doctrine?
    Page: 1951. According to McCarthy, Habermas holds that . . .
    Page: 1952. Now as before, Habermas is, for me, a tantalizing figure . . .
    Page: 1953. The abstract logical distinction between intersubjectively binding judgments . . .
    Page: 1954. Any properly communicative act makes or implies claims to validity . . .
    Page: 1955. Why do I speak of the second level of understanding . . .
    Page: 1956. Specific points from the discussion with Jürgen Habermas . . .
    Page: 1957. Witness critically appropriated is theology
    Page: 1958. Concerning Academic Freedom and Tenure
    Page: 1959. On Professionalization and Academic Freedom
    Page: 1960. What Is Rationality?